München on Spielberg's Munich
Was really looking forward to this one. Plot sounded great. Good cast. The Spielberg touch -- when it's a serious project, no one is better (Ryan and Schindler, for instance).
My verdict? Really disappointed. And the thing is, if 45-55 minutes had been cut, it might well be the best film of the year.
Spoiler alert!
*************
The photography is stunning. From the re-creations of the initial kidnapping, to locations around
But... it just dragged. Our hero quickly realizes he's losing his humanity in performing these jobs, and he reaches the conclusion that another terrorist will simply take the place of the one he just killed so quickly, we wonder why we sit through the next couple hours. The paranoia, so vital to the plot, comes in quickly, but loses its tension after so much time. And I just don't get his haunted visions -- wouldn't the awful images of the athletes being butchered be a source of inspiration for him? Not pain; if anything, it should be relief for him.
I love Spielberg. Have since Jaws. But in 2005, he made two of the most disappointing films of the year. Is he just too powerful, and editor will dare tell him "Steve, we gotta cut the prostitute assassin, we gotta cut the
1 Comments:
Here's my five word review of "Munich"
Spielberg fetishises isreali revenge fantasy
But I actually liked it. I think future film students will study janusz's camera technique.
Post a Comment
<< Home